French President Emmanuel Macron has said he convinced US President Donald Trump not to withdraw troops from Syria and instead commit “for the long term”.
Earlier this month, Mr Trump declared that the US would “be coming out of Syria very soon”.
On Saturday, joint US, UK and French strikes targeted Syrian government sites in response to an alleged chemical weapons attack.
Mr Macron said he also persuaded Mr Trump to keep the strikes limited.
The pair, who are reported to have a friendly relationship, spoke several times in the days before the military action was taken.
Inspectors from the independent Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) are in Syria to inspect the site of the alleged chemical attack, but British diplomats said Syria and Russia had not yet allowed the inspectors to visit the site.
After Mr Macron’s comments, White House spokeswoman Sarah Sanders said: “The US mission has not changed – the president has been clear that he wants US forces to come home as quickly as possible”.
But she added that the US was “determined to completely crush” the Islamic State group and prevent its return.
Announcing the strikes in an address to the nation on Friday evening in Washington, Mr Trump insisted: “America does not seek an indefinite presence in Syria – under no circumstances.”
The US has about 2,000 personnel on the ground in eastern Syria supporting an alliance of Kurdish and Arab militias called the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF).
Catch up on the strikes:
What did Mr Macron say?
Speaking in a live TV interview, during which he was grilled on several subjects, Mr Macron said: “Ten days ago, President Trump was saying ‘the United States should withdraw from Syria’. We convinced him it was necessary to stay for the long term.”
In telephone calls with Mr Trump, he also said he “persuaded him that we needed to limit the strikes to chemical weapons [sites], after things got a little carried away over tweets”.
A tweet from Mr Trump last week about US missile strikes on Syria had read: “Get ready, Russia, because they will be coming, nice and new and ‘smart’. You shouldn’t be partners with a Gas Killing Animal who kills his people and enjoys it!”
The French president appears to have struck up a strong relationship with his US counterpart and this month will be afforded the first formal White House state visit of the Trump presidency.
Mr Macron insisted the Western allies had “complete international legitimacy to act” in Syria. He said the allies had clear proof there had been a chemical attack in the town of Douma near Damascus on 7 April and that the Syrian government was responsible. Syria vehemently denies this.
Mr Macron said he told Russian President Vladimir Putin directly that Russia – which backs the Syrian government militarily – was complicit.
“They have not used chlorine themselves but they have methodically built the international community’s inability to act through diplomatic channels to stop the use of chemical weapons,” he said.
Macron thrives under tough questioning
By Hugh Schofield, Paris correspondent for BBC News
No-one in France can remember watching a presidential interview quite like this. Out went deference, journalistic fawning and the patsy questions. In came two attack hounds of the press, Jean-Jacques Bourdin and Edwy Plenel – both men bent, it seemed, on a proper slug-out with the head of state.
A sign of the style: not once did the journalists call Emmanuel Macron “Monsieur le President,” which would be the norm on such occasions. Every time they wanted to address him, they said simply: “Emmanuel Macron.”
The irony is that far from inconveniencing Mr Macron, this new aggression suits him down to the ground. In the heat of debate, he performs well. He knows his stuff.
And on Syria, he made the strongest case yet for his policy – much-criticised – of sticking close to Donald Trump. If it was indeed Emmanuel Macron who talked Trump into “re-engaging” with Syria after the suspected chemical attack, then that is an enormous success for France.
And the first dividend from a most unlikely presidential friendship.
The wave of strikes had represented the most significant attack against President Bashar al-Assad’s government by Western powers in seven years of Syria’s civil war.
Mr Macron said he still wanted dialogue with all parties, including Russia, to try to find a political solution and would go ahead with a planned trip to Moscow next month.
The French parliament will be holding an urgent debate on the country’s military action at 17:00 local time (15:00 GMT).
MPs in the UK parliament are also due to question PM Theresa May on the air strikes. The opposition believes Mrs May should have consulted parliament before launching them.
What’s happening on the ground in Syria?
Inspectors from the independent OPCW are now in the country.
But according to British diplomats at an urgent meeting in the OPCW headquarters in The Hague, the organisation’s director says his experts are still waiting for Syria and Russia to grant them access to the alleged attack site in Douma.
At the meeting, UK ambassador to the Netherlands Peter Wilson accused Russia of trying to undermine all OPCW investigations into alleged chemical weapons use by Syrian government troops.
Russia in turn blamed other parties of trying to block their efforts to make a create a new way of investigating such chemical weapons claims.
Western allies believe the claimed attack killed dozens of people with the use of chlorine gas and possibly Sarin.
The Russians say there is no trace of any chemicals and questioned why the allies carried out strikes before the inspectors had reported.
Russia says the attack in Douma was staged, accusing the UK of orchestrating it.
The OPCW will not seek to establish, or publicly announce, who was responsible for the attack.
What are the latest diplomatic moves?
Speaking on TV, US envoy to the UN Nikki Haley said new sanctions would be announced on Monday against Russian companies with links to President Assad.
This would be the second tranche of sanctions against Russian firms in a month, partly related to Russia’s support for Syria.
Ms Haley also ruled out any direct talks with Mr Assad.
British Foreign Secretary Boris Johnson said no further strikes were planned, but that this would be reassessed if more chemical attacks took place.
President Putin spoke to Iranian counterpart Hassan Rouhani by phone on Sunday, telling him that any new Western strikes on Syria would spark “international chaos”.
Syria is also high on the agenda of an EU foreign ministers’ meeting taking place in Luxembourg.
The future of the Syrian war:
What was targeted by the US, UK and France?
Three sites. Firstly, the Barzeh complex, which the US says is a centre for development, production and testing of chemical and biological weapons, although Syria denies this.
The other two were suspected chemical weapons facilities at Him Shinshar near Homs.
The US said 105 missiles were launched and it believed none were intercepted by Syrian defences. It said Syria’s chemical weapons programme had been set back years.
The Russians said 71 missiles were shot down by Syrian systems.